8 August 2026
You are covered in anchors (you just didn't set them on purpose)
A song comes on in a supermarket and your whole afternoon changes shade. A particular smell, school corridors, or a certain brand of soap relocates you thirty years in half a second. A name appears in your inbox and your shoulders are up around your ears before you’ve read a word of the email.
None of that is mysterious. It’s association: a stimulus got wired to a state, usually during a moment of strong feeling, and now the stimulus fires the state on its own. Pavlov documented the mechanics over a century ago with dogs, a bell, and dinner. NLP’s word for it is anchoring, and its contribution was to point out two things. First, you are already covered in anchors that were set by accident. Second, if association works that reliably by accident, you can set some on purpose.
The accidental collection
Before doing anything deliberate, it’s worth a look at the collection you already own. Some anchors are pleasant: the smell of coffee, the opening bars of a song you love, or the sound of a particular person’s laugh. Some are neutral. And some are quietly running your week. The chair you always slump in. The ringtone you assigned to a difficult client. The route past the office where things went badly. Each one nudges your state, and because the nudge is automatic, it never gets examined.
The examining alone is worth doing. A state that arrives automatically feels like the truth about how things are (“this meeting is going to be awful”) rather than what it is, which is a conditioned response to walking into a particular room.
The deliberate version
The classic NLP exercise goes like this: you recall a time you felt a resourceful state vividly, say, calm or confident. As the feeling peaks, you apply a unique stimulus, traditionally a specific touch, like pressing thumb and middle finger together. Repeat the pairing a few times, and the touch starts to fire a portion of the state on demand.
Does it work? Here’s the honest version: the underlying mechanism, classical conditioning, is about as well-established as anything in psychology. The NLP application, setting anchors deliberately in minutes rather than over repeated trials, has a much thinner evidence base, and studies on it are few and mixed. In practice, people vary. Some get a reliable, usable response; others get little. The good news is it costs about ten minutes to find out which you are, and nothing but the ten minutes if the answer is “not much”.
Something to try
Skip the deliberate version for now and do the audit. Over the next two days, catch three moments where your state changes and you didn’t choose it: a song, a name, a room, or a time of day. Write down the trigger and what it fires. You’re not fixing anything yet. You’re just turning automatic into visible, which is where every other technique starts.
Then, if you’re curious about the deliberate version, that’s exactly the sort of thing the daily emails walk through one small step at a time.